Alberto Gonzales Can’t Find a Job, Whines
Alberto Gonzlaes has decided to write a book. It will consist of several hundred blank pages, as he simply doesn’t recall much of what he did during his tenure in the Bush Administration. What is pitiful is that Gonzales compares himself to victims of the War on Terror, because the Senate picked on him, I suppose. Shameful and pitiful.
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Gonzales Can't Find a Job
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
The nice enemy
Canada: the 'nice' enemy
As the Taliban's snowbirds frolic in camps in Pakistan, experts reflect on the protagonists in Afghanistan
By MATTHEW FISHERDecember 30, 2008
Taliban fighters who only weeks ago were at war with Canadian troops in Kandahar frolicked at a lake near the northern Pakistani city of Peshawar.
The holidayers are part of the annual fall migration of large numbers of Taliban fighters from the many battlefields of southern and eastern Afghanistan. As cold nights sap their energy to fight in the lowlands and snow chokes mountain passes, the Taliban flood into Afghan refugee camps to the north of the Pakistani capital for the winter.
"Those who fight the Canadians are retiring for the winter," said Sami Yousafzai, a Newsweek correspondent widely considered to have the best contacts among the Taliban of any journalist.
I feel sorry for the replacement Senator--he won't get respect
Barack Obama says Democratic senators should reject the man proposed by Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich to replace Mr Obama in the US Senate.
Mr Blagojevich is the subject of a criminal inquiry and has been charged with attempting to "sell" Mr Obama's now-vacant seat to the highest bidder.
The governor defied pressure to pick Roland Burris, the state's former attorney general, to fill the position.
Democratic senators have vowed to veto anyone appointed by Mr Blagojevich.
The president-elect said he agreed the Senate "cannot accept" a new senator chosen by Mr Blagojevich, adding that Mr Blagojevich himself should resign.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Right-wing insanity on display in this one
Here are some examples:
Yesterday I had had enough!! Fox left us behind with all the democrat talking heads.
That with all of this working to hurt Sarah Palin is the end for me.I really think that God will step in and fight for her. He never
rushes in. He is kind and sometimes He waits to let people show their
worst. The time will come when He will move and when He does, I wonder
how much power Fox News will have left.I would not want to be in the shoes of all of those working to destroy Sarah Palin
I thought the new Huckabee show was going to be fun and last week he had it chocked full of liberal guests.
If FOX wants me back they will bring on Glenn Beck and Rush. I have had it with weasels like Hannity and O’Reilly.
The problem with FOX is that they are pandering to people that truly want fair and balanced. We conservatives want the truth.
“150 MPG” Hybrid SUV Company Claims it is Being “Muzzled”
Just weeks before the 2008 LA Auto Show, hybrid car and powertrain
maker AFS Trinity is pulling out after saying that show management
“muzzled” them by disallowing claims that their highly modified Saturn
Vue plug-in hybrids can achieve 150 mpg.
In a statement,
AFS Trinity said that “carmakers continue to seek tens of billions of
taxpayer dollars, ostensibly to develop fuel-efficient vehicle
technologies, but their conduct is evidence they are reluctant to
embrace solutions they didn’t invent.”
- » Read more on Fuel economy
- » Read more on Plug-in hybrid EVs
- » See peer reviews of Fuel Efficient Cars at Green Home
In the show management’s defense, AFS Trinity’s 150 mpg claim is
associated with a specific driving pattern which may or may not
represent average driving conditions. If their hybrids are driven 40
miles per day for 6 days and then 80 miles on one day of the week, they
use about 2 gallons to go 300 miles — which equals 150 mpg.
Because plug-in hybrids are such new technology, there is no agreed
upon method to estimate fuel economy. Typically, a plug-in hybrid can
drive up to 40 miles per day without needing to use any fuel, and
beyond 40 miles the engine kicks in and charges a battery which then
powers the car. If you only drive more than 40 miles once in a blue
moon, you could have a rather ridiculous fuel economy of several
thousand miles per gallon.
What, then, is an appropriate way to rate the fuel economy of these
new types of cars? An email from LA Auto Show management to AFS Trinity
states:
“We cannot approve this content . . . the mileage claim
is of primary concern to us. Manufacturers are forced to quote EPA
verified mpg numbers in their advertising, and . . . [your] 150-MPG
figure is an estimation. A banner like this one in the lobby is likely
to generate unfavorable reactions from manufacturers, which is
something we will take action to avoid.”
AFS countered that no concept or prototype car at the auto show has
its fuel economy certified by EPA prior to being exhibited, and told
show management they would change their promotional materials to say
that the 150 mpg claim is an “estimate.” In response, AFS Trinity was
told that no materials would be accepted in any form that made a claim
of 150 mpg and that the issue was “no longer a topic for further
discussion.”
EPA has been struggling with how to rate the fuel economy of plug-in hybrids — the most recent being a spat between EPA and GM about how to rate the upcoming Chevy Volt.
So, for the LA Auto Show management to claim that AFS Trinity is not
using approved EPA methods to estimate fuel economy, they’re kind of
off base, because even the EPA doesn’t really know how to rate fuel
economy with some of the new alternative powered vehicles.
AFS Trinity says they will be exhibiting their extreme hybrids
elsewhere in downtown LA during the auto show. I’ll be sure to go check
their cars out while I’m down there to see what all the hoopla’s about.
Image Credit and Source: AFS Trinity Power Corporation
Saturday, November 08, 2008
I like this guy's thinking and please pay attention to the last sentence.
Tribtowns.com: Enter your Zip code to find news and events in your area
Print Email Font Resize
Kirby on gay marriage: It's official - I don't care
Tribune Columnist
Article Launched: 10/24/2008 01:00:00 AM MDT
Robert Kirby
Related
* LDS Church and Prop 8
* Nov 8:
* Utah's Catholic bishop: We oppose gay marriage, too
* Thousands in Salt Lake City protest LDS stance on same-sex marriage
* Nov 7:
* Prop 8 critics have little support among minority voters
* Oct 27:
* Together for 19 years: A St. George gay couple, Mormon and Catholic, married in California
* Oct 26:
* Prop 8: California gay marriage fight divides LDS faithful
Posted: 7:15 PM-
A couple of years ago, I wrote a column in which I announced my official position on gay marriage. Basically, I don't care.
Not only do I not care if gays get married, it is none of my business. As a flaming heterosexual, it's a full-time job for me just to keep my thoughts clean in church. I don't have the energy to fret about somebody else's libido.
The column must have resurfaced on the Internet. I'm getting mail again telling me what a failure I am as a Mormon because I'm not solidly behind Proposition 8. As I understand it, the California ballot item would prevent the domestication of homosexuals. Or something like that.
Here are just a few of the attempts to get me to see reason.
"Are you a member or not? Do you want gays to get married in the temple? Please follow the brotheren's [sic] council [sic] on Proposition 8. This is a important gospel principal [sic]." G., e-mail.
"No unclean thing can enter the house of the Lord. Gays are unclean because of the Scriptures. You have to be hot or cold about it or the Lord will spat you out." T., e-mail.
"Were you listening in church when the letter was read from the First Presidency about supporting proposition eight?" R.Y., e-mail.
"Get with Prop 8 or your [sic] a homo." Anonymous,
Advertisement
letter.
Hard as it is to counter such brilliant logic, my position hasn't changed. The only serious concern I have about gays getting married is that they'll register someplace pricey.
The church is serious about the sanctity of marriage. I get that. But aren't more potentially "dangerous" marriages already being performed out there?
For example, I hear in church all the time about marriage being ordained of God. But I also hear about how the glory of God is intelligence.
Shouldn't it be against the law for stupid people to get married? What's more harmful to society - two well-dressed men getting married and settling down, or two idiots tying the knot and cranking out any number of additional idiots?
You should have to pass a harder test to get married than the one we currently have. Essentially, there are but two questions: "How old are you?" and "Is that your sister?" Hell, you could pass this test just by guessing.
There are drawbacks. Most people get married when hormones and youth make them about as dumb as they'll ever be. So, even a relatively easy test would by default raise the age limit to about 40.
With an increased marriage age limit, there would be fewer births. Genealogy would become easier to do. With fewer births, there would be fewer children born gay. Hey, isn't that what Heavenly Father would want?
OK, I was just kidding about that. But if you're really serious about putting a stop to gay sex, let them get married.
rkirby@sltrib.com
Bone Marrow Transplant Cures Patient of Aids
The startling case of an AIDS patient who underwent a bone marrow
transplant to treat leukemia is stirring new hope that gene-therapy
strategies on the far edges of AIDS research might someday cure the
disease.
The patient, a 42-year-old American living in Berlin, is still
recovering from his leukemia therapy, but he appears to have won his
battle with AIDS. Doctors have not been able to detect the virus in his
blood for more than 600 days, despite his having ceased all
conventional AIDS medication. Normally when a patient stops taking AIDS
drugs, the virus stampedes through the body within weeks, or days.
this is an amazing discovery
American military researchers say they have unlocked the secret to
regrowing limbs and recreating organs in humans who have sustained
major injuries.
Using "nanoscaffolding," the researchers have regrown a man's fingertip and the internal organs of several test subjects.
The
technology works by placing a very fine apparatus called a scaffold,
which is made of polymer fibres hundreds of times finer than a human
hair, in place of a missing limb or damaged organ. The scaffold acts as
a guide for cells to grab onto so they can begin to rebuild missing
bones and tissue.
The tissue grows through tiny holes in the scaffold, in the same way a vine snakes its way up a trellis.
After the body part has regenerated, the scaffold breaks down, is absorbed into the person's body and disappears entirely.
The
military plans to announce the breakthrough at the 26th Army Science
Conference -- which attracts more than 1,600 international military
scientists -- in Florida next month.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Malaysia to impose Fatwa against Yoga
Yoga is
becoming very popular in recent times and its followers are increasing
all over the world. The soaring popularity of yoga could be gauged
by the skyrocketing sales of yoga books, classes and equipment all over
the world.
Yoga is a traditional exercise devised by the sagea and hermits of
Hindu religion but now it is spread across all religion with big
followers in Islam and Christanity.
Fearing the growing popularity of yoga the National Fatwa Council of
Malaysia has decided to ban yoga exercise soon. They feel that Muslims
who have taken up yoga to stop practising it for fear that it could
deviate their belief.
Yoga may soon be outlawed in Malaysia, if a prominent body of
clerics which is planning to issue a fatwa on the practice, has its
way.
Malaysia's National Fatwa Council is going to impose
Fatwa on Yoga after Zakaria Stapa, a lecturer of University of
Kebangsaan's Islamic Studies Centre, yesterday advised Muslims who have
taken up yoga to stop practising it fearing that it could deviate their
belief, local news reports said.
"A ruling would be made by
the council's Chairman, Abdul Shukor Husin, in this regard," Deputy
Director-General of the Department of Islamic Development Malaysia,
Othman Mustapha, quoted as saying by New Straits Times online edition.
Friday, October 17, 2008
Lahde Quits Hedge Funds, Thanks `Idiots' for Success
Lahde Quits Hedge Funds, Thanks `Idiots' for Success (Update1)
By Katherine Burton
Oct. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Andrew Lahde, the hedge-fund manager who quit after posting an 870 percent gain last year, said farewell to clients in a letter that thanks stupid traders for making him rich and ends with a plea to legalize marijuana.
Lahde, head of Santa Monica, California-based Lahde Capital Management LLC, told investors last month he was returning their cash because the risk of using credit derivatives -- his means of betting on the falling value of bonds and loans, including subprime mortgages -- was too risky given the weakness of the banks he was trading with.
``I was in this game for money,'' Lahde, 37, wrote in a two-page letter today in which he said he had come to hate the hedge-fund business. ``The low-hanging fruit, i.e. idiots whose parents paid for prep school, Yale and then the Harvard MBA, was there for the taking. These people who were (often) truly not worthy of the education they received (or supposedly received) rose to the top of companies such as AIG, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and all levels of our government.
``All of this behavior supporting the Aristocracy, only ended up making it easier for me to find people stupid enough to take the other sides of my trades. God Bless America.''
Lahde, who managed about $80 million, told clients he'll be content to invest his own money, rather than taking cash from wealthy individuals and institutions and trying to amass a fortune worth hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars.
``I do not understand the legacy thing,'' he wrote. ``Nearly everyone will be forgotten. Give up on leaving your mark. Throw the Blackberry away and enjoy life.''
Request for Soros
He said he'd spend his time repairing his health ``as well as my entire life -- where I had to compete for spaces at universities, and graduate schools, jobs and assets under management -- with those who had all the advantages (rich parents) that I did not.''
He also suggested that billionaire George Soros sponsor a forum in which ``great minds'' would come together to create a new system of government, as the current system ``is clearly broken.''
Lahde ended his letter with a plea for the increased use of hemp as an alternative source of food and energy that segued into a call for the legalization of marijuana.
``Hemp has been used for at least 5,000 years for cloth and food, as well as just about everything that is produced from petroleum products,'' he wrote. ``Hemp is not marijuana and vice versa. Hemp is the male plant and it grows like a weed, hence the slang term.''
`Innocuous Plant'
He added, ``The evil female plant -- marijuana. It gets you high, it makes you laugh, it does not produce a hangover. Unlike alcohol, it does not result in bar fights or wife beating. So, why is this innocuous plant illegal? Is it a gateway drug? No, that would be alcohol, which is so heavily advertised in this country.''
Lahde said the only reason marijuana remains illegal is because ``Corporate America, which owns Congress, would rather sell you Paxil, Zoloft, Xanax and other addictive drugs, than allow you to grow a plant in your home without some of the profits going into their coffers.''
Lahde graduated from Michigan State University with a degree in finance and holds an MBA from the University of California, Los Angeles. He worked at Los Angeles-based hedge fund Dalton Investments LLC before founding his own firm two years ago with about $10 million.
Lahde wasn't available for comment. A woman at his firm, who asked not to be identified, confirmed the authenticity of the letter.
To contact the reporter on this story: Katherine Burton in New York at kburton@bloomberg.net
Thursday, October 16, 2008
God wins in Nebraska Court
lawsuit against God. Ernie Chambers sought an injunction against God
because of widespread death and destruction. Judge Marlon Polk has
thrown out the lawsuit. He says there's no way to properly notify the
defendant. You can't serve papers on a suspect with no address.
Chambers says he may appeal. He contends that God is aware of the
charges, since God is all-knowing.
This is litigation gone mad.
I've been thinking about Suing Road Runner for all the trauma he caused me.
Friday, October 10, 2008
Christopher Hitchens---America the Banana Republic
America the Banana Republic
The ongoing financial meltdown is just the latest example of a disturbing trend that, to this adoptive American, threatens to put the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave on a par with Zimbabwe, Venezuela, and Equatorial Guinea.
by Christopher Hitchens WEB EXCLUSIVE October 9, 2008
In a statement on the huge state-sponsored salvage of private bankruptcy that was first proposed last September, a group of Republican lawmakers, employing one of the very rudest words in their party’s thesaurus, described the proposed rescue of the busted finance and discredited credit sectors as “socialistic.” There was a sort of half-truth to what they said. But they would have been very much nearer the mark—and rather more ironic and revealing at their own expense—if they had completed the sentence and described the actual situation as what it is: “socialism for the rich and free enterprise for the rest.”
Dick Cheney
The Economic Consequences of Mr. Bush, by Joseph E. Stiglitz (December 2007)
The Sack of Washington, by Cullen Murphy (June 2007)
Empire Falls, by Niall Ferguson (October 2006)
I have heard arguments about whether it was Milton Friedman or Gore Vidal who first came up with this apt summary of a collusion between the overweening state and certain favored monopolistic concerns, whereby the profits can be privatized and the debts conveniently socialized, but another term for the same system would be “banana republic.”
Understanding the financial crisis--if it is possible
11 Things I Learned While Trying to Figure Out the Financial Crisis
7
Vote!
www.wikio.com
Like a lot of people, I’ve been struggling to understand this financial crisis over the past few weeks. I don’t pretend to be an economic expert - I’ve always been more interested in foreign policy, politics and history - but the issue of this crisis is obviously so important, it seems that it is everyone’s responsibility to find out what went on, what caused this.
I also feel that this is an issue which is confusing our politics, our partisan impulses. Both the right and the left have many reasons to hate the bailout - yet the pragmatists on both sides agree that something must be done. Everyone is angry. Very few predicted this. I only came across a few who prominently warned about a crisis such as this - subscribers to the Austrian school of economics such as Ron Paul; liberal capitalists such as Warren Buffet and George Soros; and economists like Nassim Nicholas Taleb.
This crisis has succeeded in confusing ideological categories - which is probably part of the reason it has spwarned so many interesting and non-ideological takes, as people struggle to understand these momentous events in terms they are familiar with. (Here’s one ingenious example.) On the whole, Republican politicians instinctively trusted the market and although some attempted to reign in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, they saw no imminent threat to the financial system. A few Democrats saw the need for more oversight to prevent excessive risk-taking that might endanger the financial system; many more Democrats (especially as the party in Washington is dominated by neo-liberals), didn’t see the profit in warning of an unknowable future catastrophe. Those financial firms whose main purpose was to minimize risk and maximize profit accomplished this by reducing the risk of any individual transaction while placing greater and greater stress on the system - trading many small risks for a giant catastrophic risk. But theyse firms didn’t know this because the entire system was opaque and oversight was minimal. As long as things were going well, there was no reason to figure out what was going on.
Wednesday, October 08, 2008
Workers in Dubai treated like modern day slaves
'We need slaves to build monuments'
It is already home to the world's glitziest buildings, man-made islands and mega-malls - now Dubai plans to build the tallest tower. But behind the dizzying construction boom is an army of migrant labourers lured into a life of squalor and exploitation. Ghaith Abdul-Ahad reports
* Ghaith Abdul-Ahad
*
o Ghaith Abdul-Ahad
o The Guardian,
o Wednesday October 8 2008
Workers sleep on the street in Dubai
Workers sleep on the street in Dubai. Photograph: Ghaith Abdul Ahad
The sun is setting and its dying rays cast triangles of light on to the bodies of the Indian workers. Two are washing themselves, scooping water from tubs in a small yard next to the labour camp's toilets. Others queue for their turn. One man stands stamping his feet in a bucket, turned into a human washing machine. The heat is suffocating and the sandy wind whips our faces. The sprinkles of water from men drying their clothes fall like welcome summer rain.
All around, a city of labour camps stretches out in the middle of the Arabian desert, a jumble of low, concrete barracks, corrugated iron, chicken-mesh walls, barbed wire, scrap metal, empty paint cans, rusted machinery and thousands of men with tired and gloomy faces.
I have left Dubai's spiralling towers, man-made islands and mega-malls behind and driven through the desert to the outskirts of the neighbouring city of Abu Dhabi. Turn right before the Zaha Hadid bridge, and a few hundred metres takes you to the heart of Mousafah, a ghetto-like neighbourhood of camps hidden away from the eyes of tourists. It is just one of many areas around the Gulf set aside for an army of labourers building the icons of architecture that are mushrooming all over the region.
Behind the showers, in a yard paved with metal sheets, a line of men stands silently in front of grease-blackened pans, preparing their dinner. Sweat rolls down their heads and necks, their soaked shirts stuck to their backs. A heavy smell of spices and body odour fills the air.
Next to a heap of rubbish, a man holds a plate containing his meal: a few chillies, an onion and three tomatoes, to be fried with spices and eaten with a piece of bread.
In a neighbouring camp, a group of Pakistani workers from north and south Waziristan sit exhaustedly sipping tea while one of them cooks outside. In the middle of the cramped room in which 10 men sleep, one worker in a filthy robe sits on the floor grinding garlic and onions with a mortar and pestle while staring into the void.
Hamidullah, a thin Afghan from Maydan, a village on the outskirts of Kabul, tells me: "I spent five years in Iran and one year here, and one year here feels like 10 years. When I left Afghanistan I thought I would be back in a few months, but now I don't know when I will be back." Another worker on a bunk bed next to him adds: "He called his home yesterday and they told him that three people from his village were killed in fighting. This is why we are here."
Hamidullah earns around 450 dirhams (£70) a month as a construction worker.
How is life, I ask.
"What life? We have no life here. We are prisoners. We wake up at five, arrive to work at seven and are back at the camp at nine in the evening, day in and day out."
Outside in the yard, another man sits on a chair made of salvaged wood, in front of a broken mirror, a plastic sheet wrapped around his neck, while the camp barber trims his thick beard. Despite the air of misery, tonight is a night of celebration. One of the men is back from a two-week break in his home village in Pakistan, bringing with him a big sack of rice, and is cooking pilau rice with meat. Rice is affordable at weekends only: already wretched incomes have been eroded by the weak dollar and rising food prices. "Life is worse now," one worker told me. "Before, we could get by on 140 dirhams [£22] a month; now we need 320 to 350."
The dozen or so men sit on newspapers advertising luxury watches, mobile phones and high-rise towers. When three plastic trays arrive, filled with yellowish rice and tiny cubes of meat, each offers the rare shreds of meat to his neighbours.
All of these men are part of a huge scam that is helping the construction boom in the Gulf. Like hundreds of thousands of migrant workers, they each paid more than £1,000 to employment agents in India and Pakistan. They were promised double the wages they are actually getting, plus plane tickets to visit their families once a year, but none of the men in the room had actually read their contract. Only two of them knew how to read.
"They lied to us," a worker with a long beard says. "They told us lies to bring us here. Some of us sold their land; others took big loans to come and work here."
Once they arrive in the United Arab Emirates, migrant workers are treated little better than cattle, with no access to healthcare and many other basic rights. The company that sponsors them holds on to their passports - and often a month or two of their wages to make sure that they keep working. And for this some will earn just 400 dirhams (£62) a month.
A group of construction engineers told me, with no apparent shame, that if a worker becomes too ill to work he will be sent home after a few days. "They are the cheapest commodity here. Steel, concrete, everything is up, but workers are the same."
As they eat, the men talk more about their lives. "My shift is eight hours and two overtime, but in reality we work 18 hours," one says. "The supervisors treat us like animals. I don't know if the owners [of the company] know."
"There is no war, and the police treat us well," another chips in, "but the salary is not good."
"That man hasn't been home for four years," says Ahmad, the chef for the night, pointing at a well-built young man. "He has no money to pay for the flight."
A steel worker says he doesn't know who is supposed to pay for his ticket back home. At the recruiting agency they told him it would be the construction company - but he didn't get anything in writing.
One experienced worker with spectacles and a prayer cap on his head tells me that things are much better than they used to be. Five years ago, when he first came, the company gave him nothing. There was no air conditioning in the room and sometimes no electricity. "Now, they give AC to each room and a mattress for each worker."
Immigrant workers have no right to form unions, but that didn't stop strikes and riots spreading across the region recently - something unheard of few years ago. Elsewhere in Mousafah, I encounter one of the very few illegal unions, where workers have established a form of underground insurance scheme, based on the tribal structure back home. "When we come here," one member of the scheme tells me, "we register with our tribal elders, and when one of us is injured and is sent home, or dies, the elders collect 30 dirhams from each of us and send the money home to his family."
In a way, the men at Mousafah are the lucky ones. Down in the Diera quarter of old Dubai, where many of the city's illegal workers live, 20 men are often crammed into one small room.
UN agencies estimate that there are up to 300,000 illegal workers in the emirates.
On another hot evening, hundreds of men congregate in filthy alleyways at the end of a day's work, sipping tea and sitting on broken chairs. One man rests his back on the handles of his pushcart, silently eating his dinner next to a huge pile of garbage.
In one of the houses, a man is hanging his laundry over the kitchen sink, a reeking smell coming from a nearby toilet. Next door, men lie on the floor. They tell me they are all illegal and they are scared and that I have to leave.
Outside, a fistfight breaks out between Pakistani workers and Sri Lankans.
The alleyways are dotted with sweatshops, where Indian men stay until late at night, bending over small tables sewing on beads.
A couple of miles away, the slave market becomes more ugly. Outside a glitzy hotel, with a marble and glass facade, dozens of prostitutes congregate according to their ethnic groups: Asians to the right, next to them Africans, and, on the left, blondes from the former Soviet Union. There are some Arab women. Iranians, I am told, are in great demand. They charge much higher prices and are found only in luxury hotels.
Like the rest of the Gulf region, Dubai and Abu Dhabi are being built by expat workers. They are strictly segregated, and a hierarchy worthy of previous centuries prevails.
At the top, floating around in their black or white robes, are the locals with their oil money. Immaculate and pampered, they own everything. Outside the "free zones", where the rules are looser, no one can start a business in the UAE without a partner from the emirates, who often does nothing apart from lending his name. No one can get a work permit without a local sponsor.
Under the locals come the western foreigners, the experts and advisers, making double the salaries they make back home, all tax free. Beneath them are the Arabs - Lebanese and Palestinians, Egyptians and Syrians. What unites these groups is a mixture of pretension and racism.
"Unrealistic things happen to your mind when you come here," a Lebanese woman who frequently visits Dubai tells me as she drives her new black SUV. "Suddenly, you can make $5,000 [£2,800] a month. You can get credit so easy, you buy the car of your dreams, you shop and you think it's a great bargain; when you go to dinner, you go to a hotel ... nowhere else can you live like this."
Down at the base of the pyramid are the labourers, waiters, hotel employees and unskilled workers from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Ethiopia, the Philippines and beyond. They move deferentially around the huge malls, cafes, bars and restaurants, bowing down and calling people sir and madam. In the middle of the day, during the hottest hours, you can see them sleeping in public gardens under trees, or on the marble floors of the Dubai Mosque, on benches or pieces of cardboard on side streets. These are the victims of the racism that is not only flourishing in the UAE but is increasingly being exported to the rest of the Middle East. Sometimes it reminds you of the American south in the 1930s.
One evening in Abu Dhabi, I have dinner with my friend Ali, a charming Iraqi engineer whom I have known for two decades. After the meal, as his wife serves saffron-flavoured tea, he pushes back his chair and lights a cigar. We talk about stock markets, investment and the Middle East, and then the issue of race comes up.
"We will never use the new metro if it's not segregated," he tells me, referring to the state-of-the-art underground system being built in neighbouring Dubai. "We will never sit next to Indians and Pakistanis with their smell," his wife explains.
Not for the first time, I am told that while the immigrant workers are living in appalling conditions, they would be even worse off back home - as if poverty in one place can justify exploitation in the other.
"We need slaves," my friend says. "We need slaves to build monuments. Look who built the pyramids - they were slaves."
Sharla Musabih, a human rights campaigner who runs the City of Hope shelter for abused women, is familiar with such sentiments. "Once you get rich on the back of the poor," she says, "it's not easy to let go of that lifestyle. They are devaluing human beings," she says. "The workers might eat once a day back home, but they have their family around them, they have respect. They are not asking for a room in a hotel - all they are asking for is respect for their humanity."
Towards the end of another day, on a fabulous sandy beach near the Dubai marina, the waves wash calmly over the beautiful sand. A couple are paragliding over the blue sea; on the new islands, gigantic concrete structures stand like spaceships. As tourists laze on the beach, Filipino, Indian and Pakistani workers, stand silently watching from a dune, cut off from the holidaymakers by an invisible wall.
Behind them rise more brand-new towers.
"It's a Green Zone mentality," a young Arab working in IT tells me. "People come to make money. They live in bubbles. They all want to make as much money as possible and leave."
Back at the Mousafah camps, a Pakistani worker walks me through his neighbourhood. On both sides of the dusty lane stand concrete barracks and the familiar detritus: raw sewage, garbage, scrap metal. A man washes his car, and in a cage chickens flutter up and down.
We enter one of the rooms, flip-flops piled by the door.
Inside, a steelworker gets a pile of papers from a plastic envelope and shoves them into my lap. He is suing the company that employed him for unpaid wages. "I've been going to court for three months, and every time I go they tell me to come in two weeks." His friends nod their heads. "Last time the [company] lawyer told me, 'I am in the law here - you will not get anything."
Economically, Dubai has progressed a lot in the past 10 years, but socially it has stayed behind," says Musabih. "Labour conditions are like America in the 19th century - but that's not acceptable in the 21st century."
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
They want us to follow their rules while there but we have to adjust when they are here
A 28-year-old Russian female, who visited Dubai on a tourist visa, and a 30-year-old male citizen of Lebanon, a salesman in a local store, were put on trial for drinking juice in a public place in the daytime during Muslim fasting.
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Final Stages of the Coup
Welcome to the final stages of the coup...
RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com
Read More: Bailout Bill, Congressional Powers, Coup, Democracy, Economy, Fascism, Open Blackmail, Terrorism, The Business Plot, Wall Street Crisis, Politics News
Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
*
Share
*
*
Comments
UPDATES AT BOTTOM
If you must break the law, do it to seize power: in all other cases observe it. ~ Julius Caesar
In 2000, the long fought for and long admired democracy of the United States of America began a slow and steady decline toward fascism - a Bush family tradition - with the installment of a president - a man the citizens overwhelmingly rejected (although the funny math told a still believed myth) - by a few corrupt judges on the US Supreme Court. That coup is now nearly complete and checkmate is all but unavoidable.
Let me first point you to the Bush administration's so-called Wall Street bailout bill, here, so that you can see for yourself that this treachery is being conducted in the light of day. Fascism is finally and formally out of the right-wing closet even if the F word is not yet openly being used (although it should be, and often).
Now, if you do not yet understand that the Wall Street crisis is a man-made disaster done through intentional deregulation and corruption, I have a bridge in Alaska to sell to you (or Sara Palin does anyway). This manufactured crisis is now to be remedied, if the fiscal fascists get their way, with the total transfer of Congressional powers (the few that still remain) to the Executive Branch and the total transfer of public funds into corporate (via government as intermediary) hands.
Adam Davidson of NPR blogs about the so-called bailout bill as follows:
Friday, September 05, 2008
Faked Honour Killings in Jordan
Jordan 'honour killings' cover for other crimes
Men exploit lenient laws to murder women for inheritance, settling family feuds or to hide other crimes.
AMMAN - When 18-year-old Maha decided that she wanted to quit her family's prostitution ring, her brother killed her and alleged it was to "cleanse" the family's honour.
Maha is one of hundreds of women in Jordan and other conservative societies who rights groups say are killed every year by their male relatives in so-called honour crimes for "sullying" the reputation of their families.
Thursday, September 04, 2008
A real Hero--Gen. Smedley D. Butler
WAR IS A RACKET
by Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Recipient
Major General Smedley D. Butler - USMC Retired
About the Author
CHAPTER ONE
WAR IS A RACKET
WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.
A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.
How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?
Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few – the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.
And what is this bill?
This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.
For a great many years, as a soldier, I had a suspicion that war was a racket; not until I retired to civil life did I fully realize it. Now that I see the international war clouds gathering, as they are today, I must face it and speak out.
Monday, August 25, 2008
Horray for Sweden
Swedish government makes it illegal for schools to teach religious doctrine as if it were true
Thu, 03/06/2008 - 16:33 — Atheion
The Guardian - The Swedish government has announced plans to clamp down hard on religious education. It will soon become illegal even for private faith schools to teach religious doctrines as if they were true. In an interesting twist on the American experience, prayer will remain legal in schools - after all, it has no truth value. But everything that takes place on the curriculum's time will have to be secular. "Pupils must be protected from every sort of fundamentalism," said the minister for schools, Jan Björklund.
Creationism and ID are explicitly banned but so is proselytising even in religious education classes. The Qur'an may not be taught as if it is true even in Muslim independent schools, nor may the Bible in Christian schools. The decision looks like a really startling attack on the right of parents to have their children taught what they would like. Of course it does not go so far as the Dawkins policy of prohibiting parents from trying to pass on their doctrines even in their own families - and, if it did, it would certainly run foul of the European convention on human rights. It does not even go as far as Nyamko Sabuni, the minister for integration - herself born in Burundi - would like: she wanted to ban all religious schools altogether. But it is still a pretty drastic measure from an English perspective.
The law is being presented in Sweden as if it mostly concerned fundamentalist Christian sects in the backwoods; but the Christian Democratic party, which represents such people if anyone does, is perfectly happy with the new regulation. There is little doubt that combating Islamic fundamentalism is the underlying aim, especially in conjunction with another new requirement that all independent schools declare all their funding sources. This would allow the inspectors - whose budget is being doubled - to concentrate their efforts on those schools most likely to be paid to break the rules.
In the background to these announcements comes the release of a frightening documentary film on Swedish jihadis, which follows young men over a period of two years on their slow conversion to homicidal lunacy.
Thursday, August 07, 2008
I doubt he even hears what he is saying
Bush chides Beijing over rights
George Bush urges China to improve its human rights records
US President George W Bush has expressed "deep concerns" over China's human rights record in a speech on the eve of the Beijing Olympics.
"The US believes the people of China deserve the fundamental liberty that is the natural right of all human beings," he said in the Thai capital, Bangkok.
He praised China's economy but said only respect for human rights would let it realise its full potential.
But China rejected the US president's comments.
"The Chinese government puts people first, and is dedicated to maintaining and promoting its citizens' basic rights and freedom," Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said.
"We firmly oppose any words or acts that interfere in other countries' internal affairs, using human rights and religion and other issues."
'Firm opposition'
Mr Bush has been criticised by some campaigners for going to the Games.
He flew to Beijing following the speech in Bangkok, a stop on his final trip to Asia before he leaves office in January.
The wide-ranging address, which included criticism of the regime in Burma, was more nuanced than Mr Bush's past speeches on China, the BBC's Jonathan Head reports from Bangkok.
It is unlikely to cause much offence in China, our correspondent says, and many people will see it more as a valedictory speech for Mr Bush's record in Asia rather than an outline of future US policy.
Mr Bush said he was optimistic about China's future and said change in China would arrive "on its own terms".
Young people who grow up with the freedom to trade goods will ultimately demand the freedom to trade ideas...
George W Bush
US president
But his criticisms of China's human rights record were clear.
"America stands in firm opposition to China's detention of political dissidents, human rights advocates and religious activists," he said.
When it was controversially awarded the games in 2001 by the International Olympic Committee, Beijing promised to make improvements in human rights, media freedoms and the provision of health and education.
But campaigners, such as Amnesty International, say Chinese activists have been jailed, people made homeless, journalists detained and websites blocked, while there has been increased use of labour camps and prison beatings.
In March, China suppressed violent anti-government protests in Tibet. Beijing said rioters killed at least 19 people, but Tibetan exiles said security forces killed dozens of protesters in the worst unrest in Tibet for 20 years.
The Dalai Lama, Tibet's exiled Buddhist leader, rejected Beijing's claims he was behind the riots and said he expressed good wishes for the success of Games.
On Thursday, at least 1,500 Buddhists were holding a protest in the Nepalese capital Kathmandu against what they called China's violation of religious freedom in Tibet. Correspondents say there have been scuffles with police.
In Beijing, police dragged away three US Christians who tried to demonstrate on Tiananmen Square in support of religious freedom.
Four pro-Tibet activists from Britain and the US were arrested and held briefly in the city on Wednesday after a protest close to the Olympic stadium.
Burma refugees
In his address, Mr Bush said the US recognised that the growth sparked by China's free market reforms was "good for the Chinese people" and the country's' purchasing power was "good for the world".
On foreign policy, he commended China's "critical leadership role" in the negotiations to end North Korea's nuclear weapons programme, and the "constructive relationship" between Beijing and Washington over Taiwan.
He also called for an end to what he described as tyranny in Thailand's neighbour, Burma.
Friday's Olympic opening ceremony coincides with the 20th anniversary of a democracy uprising in Burma, which was crushed by the military.
First lady Laura Bush flew to the Thai-Burmese border to spend the day at the Mae La refugee camp where about 35,000 refugees live, having fled their homes.
Saturday, July 26, 2008
The Fix is In
Court gags Cayman Whistleblower
From Wikileaks
Jump to: navigation, search
Grand Cayman News
Wednesday February 20, 2008
In the latest round of a saga that could have come from the pen of best-selling writer John Grisham’s novel, Bank Julius Baer (BJB) has succeeded in temporarily shutting down one outlet of Wikileaks, an international online transparency group.
According to internet reports, the Swiss banking giant has tried to silence their former Cayman Islands Chief Operating Officer, Rudolf Elmer, by using a court injunction to shut down the Wikileaks website, which contains what are alleged to be highly damaging documents about the bank’s offshore activities.
The Temporary Restraining Order, issued by the California Northern District Court in San Francisco, is aimed at a Domain Name Registrar, rather than just the actual publishers of controversial material, who are based outside US legal jurisdiction.
At the centre of the dispute are several hundred documents, purportedly showing offshore tax evasion and money laundering by extremely wealthy and, in some cases, politically sensitive BJB clients from the US, Europe, China and Peru, reportedly released by a Swiss whistleblower.
While the former Cayman Islands employee is apparently being targeted as the source of the material, he is not only reported to be emphatically denying releasing any documents but, according to all current reports, has not been connected with the leaks.
The original release of documents dates back to at least 2002/3 when secret BJB files relating to Cayman Islands accounts were sent to US tax authorities.
A further release of documents in 2005 targeted German account holders, whose details and account balances from US$5 million to over US$100 million, initiated a probe by the country’s authorities into possible tax evasion.
As a result, bank customers, who are understood to regard themselves as victims of a conflict between the bank and a former employee, may be forced to pay millions in taxes and in some cases could lose their entire investments.
While Mr Elmer is currently the target of BJB investigations, the whistleblower has apparently only ever been identified as ‘Teddy Baer’ or the ‘tax fraud revealer’.
Despite claims that the documents were “stolen” from the bank’s Grand Cayman office, there is no indication in any of the current reports that BJB filed any formal complaint with the Royal Cayman Islands Police Service (RCIPS), even though the removal of the documents certainly broke Swiss law and probably, according to one source, broke Cayman Islands’ law.
However, published reports suggest that BJB has conducted their own thorough, and sometimes robust, internal investigation into the leaks, including the use of private detectives.
One phase of this was subjecting Cayman-based employees to a polygraph, or lie detector test.
Mr Elmer has apparently, and without response, complained to the Cayman Islands government about the conduct of this test, which was, unlike in the USA where clear regulations exist for the conduct of polygraph tests, allegedly conducted without any statutory controls in place.
He also is reported to have claimed that his life was threatened and anonymous phone callers suggested the family should return to Switzerland “for their own good.”
Following the polygraph test, Mr Elmer was ‘laid off’ by BJB and returned to Zurich with his family. There, he claims to have been subjected to unrelenting pressure, including what he states was a half-million Swiss francs bribe, to stop doing something that he denies ever doing in the first place. In December 2007, he even took an unsuccessful anti-stalking case before the Swiss courts in an attempt to prevent BJB’s investigators following him.
Even though the documents and reports have been in the public domain for some time, BJB sought the California injunctions, stating the disclosures “constitute violation of trade secrets, conversion and stolen documents by former employee in violation of a written confidentiality agreement and copyright infringement, among other wrongful and tortuous conduct.”
Ironically, the move has not prevented access to the documents, and Cayman Net News had no problem reading the documents, along with Wikileaks’ comments on them, online.
Amongst the allegations Wikileaks makes against BJB are that the documents show evidence of deliberate tax evasion and, in one case, an account was allegedly used to handle bribery funds.
The latest high profile scandal comes at a time when the Cayman Islands, despite extensive work to ensure the offshore banking industry is properly regulated, is coming under renewed pressure from US legislators, who are claiming the islands represent an unacceptable haven for tax evaders. The revelation that bribe money may be flowing through accounts based in Grand Cayman will, although no official comment has so far been forthcoming, also be causing concern as the draft anti-corruption laws as still a long way from reaching the statute books. These laws, which are already in place in other offshore jurisdictions, would allow for the seizure of funds obtained by, or used for, bribery.
While this saga plays out in California, the RCIPS are currently investigating the death of another Swiss banker working in Grand Cayman. Frederic Bise was found dead in the back of his burning Mitsubishi Outlander on Friday, 8 February.
First appeared in the: Grand Cayman News
More shameful behavior for US Media
How journalists desperate for dirt on Obama fell for forged documents without so much as an eye blink.
An image of Senator Obama with Raila Odinga in Kenya, 2006, together with a typical US conservative caption from 2008. This caption was taken from an article entitled Obama's Muslim Connection by Jon Christian Ryter. The same image is referenced by The Spectator's Melanie Phillips opposite. Mr. Odinga is, infact, a moderate Christian.
An image of Senator Obama with Raila Odinga in Kenya, 2006, together with a typical US conservative caption from 2008. This caption was taken from an article entitled Obama's Muslim Connection by Jon Christian Ryter. The same image is referenced by The Spectator's Melanie Phillips opposite. Mr. Odinga is, infact, a moderate Christian.
“
If Mr. Obama did not know about Mr. Odinga's electoral deal with the Kenyan Islamists when he offered his support, then he should have known. If he did know, then he is guilty of lending the prestige of his office to America's enemies in the global war on terror. We need to know exactly what Mr. Obama knew about Mr. Odinga, and precisely when he knew it.
„
— Daniel Johnson, The New York Sun
“
...the real significance of the picture is surely that it renews concern about Obama’s involvement in Kenyan politics — in particular, his apparent support for the Kenyan opposition leader Raila Odinga, who signed a memorandum of understanding with Kenyan Muslims to turn Kenya into an Islamic state governed by sharia law.
„
— Melanie Phillips, The Spectator
JOEL WHITNEY (Guernica Magazine) with JULIAN ASSANGE (Wikileaks)
Wednesday July 15, 2008
The transparency website Wikileaks has released a document further debunking claims that a Kenyan politician close to Senator Barack Obama sought votes by virtually pledging to turn the Christian country into a militant Muslim stronghold. Since the start of the year, the claims, contextualized to insinuate that Sentator Obama supports Sharia law, have been spread by both traditional and online media. As of July 2008, Google lists over 250,000 webpages connecting the two politicians.
Dated August 29, 2007, the new document is a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Kenya's now Prime Minister Raila Odinga and the National Muslim Leaders' Forum; in the MOU, Odinga pledges to look into the case of 100 Kenyans who were illegally renditioned to places like Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Somalia, and Ethiopia in January and February 2007. Wikileaks also released a followup letter and the names of witnesses to the signing of the document.
Last fall, a forged version was circulated in the lead-up to the presidential election in Kenya alleging a number of preposterous claims about Odinga. Rather than pledging, for instance, to look into the case of Abdulmalik Mohamed, a Kenyan held at Guantanamo, and others like him, the forged MOU alleged that Odinga had virtually agreed to turn Kenya into a new Saudi Arabia: allowing for Sharia Law, banning alcohol, mandating Muslim dress codes and so on. The document is significant for a number of reasons, in the United States because it re-contextualizes Senator Obama’s relationship with his ancestral homeland (on his father's side) and with Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga. For Kenyans, it is significant in that it corrects a lie about the prime minister that put him at odds with his voters.
Wikileaks published the forged document, which was spreading through email, listing it as a likely fake on November 14, 2007. It was not hard to debunk it.
"Most of the pledges [in the fake] couldn't be met by any presidential candidate,” Wikileaks wrote, “as they are inherently unconstitutional and would mightily annoy the non-Muslim majority in Kenya... The idea behind the smear is to turn a fairly large and committed evangelical Christian block against poor Raila, who is often accused of ambivalent religious allegiance."
Wikileaks’s analysis aside, it doesn't take very advanced math, wikipedia or googling skills to recognize that risking up to 80% of the vote (Kenya's Christian majority) to cater to a minority of 10% (its Muslims) doesn't add up and both Ralia Odinga and NAMELEF publicly declared the document a forgery. But writers like the New York Sun's Daniel Johnson fell hard for the fake. Senator Obama had just been to Kenya a year before and is a member of the same tribe (the 3 million strong Luo) as Raila Odinga; smelling an easy take down, Johnson swung. Here’s Johnson, two full months after Wikileaks first outed the document as probably a fake:
“In August 2006, Mr. Obama visited Kenya and spoke in support of Mr. Odinga's candidacy at rallies in Nairobi. The Web site Atlas Shrugs has even posted a photograph of the two men side by side. More recently, Mr. Odinga says that Mr. Obama interrupted his campaigning in New Hampshire to have a telephone conversation with his African cousin about the constitutional crisis in Kenya.”
Titled "The Kenya Connection," Johnson's piece ends with no shortage of conspiratorial drama and bravado:
“If Mr. Obama did not know about Mr. Odinga's electoral deal with the Kenyan Islamists when he offered his support, then he should have known. If he did know, then he is guilty of lending the prestige of his office to America's enemies in the global war on terror. We need to know exactly what Mr. Obama knew about Mr. Odinga, and precisely when he knew it.”
The same question must now be asked of journalists like Mr. Johnson. Wikileaks calls the fake MOU part of a "plot to frame Odinga and Obama" and notes that their calling the document a fake "did not stop Kenyan and US proponents of the document deliberately avoiding the WikiLeaks analysis by linking directly to the memorandum, as opposed to its description page [where it was plainly described as fake]."
The New York Sun, The Spectator and all those who followed have questions to answer about the quality and integrity of their journalism.
Exposing Swiss bank destruction of records of Holocaust victims.
Christoph Meili (born April 21, 1968[1]) is a Swiss whistleblower.
In early 1997, Meili worked as a night guard at the Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS, precursor of UBS AG) in Zurich, Switzerland. He discovered that officials at UBS were destroying documents about orphaned assets, i.e., credit balances of deceased Jewish clients whose heirs' whereabouts were unknown. Destruction of such documents was a violation of Swiss laws.[2]
On January 8, 1997,[3] he took some bank files home. After a telephone conversation, he handed them over to a local Jewish organization, which brought the documents to the police, and eventually to the press, which published the document destruction on January 14, 1997.[4]
The authorities of Zürich opened a judicial investigation against Meili[5] for suspected violation of the Swiss laws on banking secrecy,[6] which is an offense to be prosecuted ex officio in Switzerland.[7] After charges were filed against him, Ed Fagan approached him and convinced him to move to the United States, where he was granted political asylum.[8][9] According to news reports, Christoph Meili and his family are the only Swiss nationals in history ever to have been granted political asylum in the United States.[10] On January 13, 1998, Fagan filed suit on behalf of Meili against UBS, demanding a sum of 2.56 billion U.S. dollars. The settlement between the Swiss banks and the plaintiffs on the order of US $1.25 billion on August 13, 1998 also covered Meili's law suit and thus ended it.[11]
Later in 1998 the investigations of the justice of Zürich against Meili for allegedly breaking the laws on bank secrecy were cancelled,[5] but Meili did not return to his homeland until 2003. His marriage ended as he was divorced at the end of February 2002.[12] In September 2003 he visited his family in Switzerland. In the Swiss newspaper Die Weltwoche, Meili criticized Fagan for having instrumentalized him and for having let him down. He claimed to have never received the US $1 million that he should have gotten[12] according to their agreements after the settlement with the Swiss banks in 1998.[13] According to a report by the Swiss newspaper Facts of March 17, 2005, he had, however, received US $750,000. (The newspaper did not state when this should have occurred.)[14] In April 2004, Fagan again launched a campaign against UBS and apparently again was supported by Meili in his endeavour.[15][16]
Meili studied communication sciences[17] right after his arrival in the United States. After completing his college degree[17] in May 2004[3] he found employment once more in the security sector. On May 14, 2005 he was naturalized as a US citizen.[17] In an interview with the Swiss newspaper Sonntagsblick on October 21, 2006, Meili re-iterated his criticism of Fagan and the Jewish organizations who had once championed him, stating again they had let him down. Meili, who still lives in Southern California, stated in that interview he was working for minimum wages.[18][19]
Justice in Iran
The 30 had their cases tried by the highest judicial authorities and were found guilty of the charges brought against them, Iran's judiciary said in a statement.
The verdicts are final, and the sentences will be carried out Sunday, according to Fars.
According to Amnesty International, Iran executed 317 people last year, second only to China's 470. The U.S. executed 42 people in 2007, according to Amnesty International.
Friday, July 25, 2008
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
You won't believe how this South Carolina teacher marked this paper
Brad Barrett's Iraq Paper
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Egyptian bad boys
CAIRO (Reuters) - Nearly two-thirds of Egyptian men admit to having
sexually harassed women in the most populous Arab country, and a
majority say women themselves are to blame for their maltreatment, a
survey showed Thursday.
The forms of harassment reported by Egyptian men, whose country
attracts millions of foreign tourists each year, include touching or
ogling women, shouting sexually explicit remarks, and exposing their
genitals to women. "Sexual harassment has become an overwhelming and
very real problem experienced by all women in Egyptian society, often
on a daily basis," said the report by the Egyptian Center for Women's
Rights.
Egyptian women and female visitors frequently complain of persistent
sexual harassment on Egyptian streets, despite the socially
conservative nature of this traditional Muslim society.
The behavior could have repercussions on Egypt's tourism industry, a
major foreign income earner, with 98 percent of foreign women saying
they had experienced harassment in the country, the survey said.
The survey of more than 2,000 Egyptian men and women and 109 foreign
women said the vast majority of Egyptians believed that sexual
harassment in Egypt was on the rise, citing a worsening economic
situation and a lack of awareness or religious values.
It said 62 percent of Egyptian men reported perpetrating harassment,
while 83 percent of Egyptian women reported having been sexually
harassed. Nearly half of women said the abuse occurred daily.
Only 2.4 percent of Egyptian women reported it to the police, with
most saying they did not believe anyone would help. Some feared
reporting harassment would hurt their reputations.
"The vast majority of women did nothing when confronted with sexual
harassment," the survey said, adding that most Egyptian women believed
the victim should "remain silent." Continued...
Friday, July 11, 2008
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
Monday, July 07, 2008
Sunday, June 29, 2008
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Friday, June 13, 2008
The one and only Howard Cable is angry of CBC's dumping of Hockey Night in Canada Theme
When I first heard that the CBC was going to dump a Canadian Icon Theme for Hockey Night in Canada I thought I was dreaming. Whoever is behind this decision at CBC should be fired. This fantastic Theme is intrinsically connected to Hockey and our Game. If it ain't broke don't fix it.
When you think of Johnny Carson you think of the Tonight Show Theme music. The dope head at CBC behind this decision is a total fool and has no concept about our game and how this Theme joins Canada as a Nation.
Julie Couillard a Man Eater according to her ex
This woman is a Femme Fatale if I ever saw one. This story has rocked Canadian Politics and has made us the laughing stock of the world.
Here is a definition of Femme Fatale:
A femme fatale (plural: femmes fatales) is an alluring and seductive
woman whose charms ensnare her lovers in bonds of irresistible desire,
often leading them into compromising, dangerous, and deadly situations.
Ex-hubby less than kind to Couillard
MONTREAL
-- Nicknamed the Mata Hari of the 450 area code in reference to the
Dutch dancer who used her charms to spy for the Germans during World
War I, Julie Couillard is described by a source close to one of her
former lovers as "a man-eater."
Indeed, her ex-husband Stephane Sirois has
said in media reports: "I'm not a saint but neither is she. She is
attracted to people who have money and power."
Sirois, a former member of the Quebec
biker gang the Rockers turned police informant, is under the Witness
Protection Program because of the role he played in the 2003 trial of
Hells Angels Leader Maurice (Mom) Boucher -- and he's not kind to
Julie, describing her as a charmer who now pretends to be easily
offended because her name has been dragged in the mud.
Sirois said he met Couillard one spring night in 1997 at a bar in Montreal's north end.
"We were partying. The club was known for being a biker bar. Why would
she show up there if she didn't want to meet bikers?" he said.
Sources said about 100 people -- including members of organized crime
-- attended the ceremony and reception. The couple divorced in April
1999.
According to public documents, Couillard
describes herself at times as a businesswoman, consultant and real
estate promoter who volunteers at federal elections.
She has been a licensed real estate agent since April 2007. Her licence was renewed in January 2008.
Through the real estate development company Kevlar, she apparently
approached people in political circles to land a construction contract
for a federal building project in Quebec City. She also attended
Conservative party fundraisers.
UN: Abolish the Monarchy in England--Idiotic I say
BRITAIN has been told to get rid of the Queen in an official United Nations report.
on the desirability or otherwise of a written constitution, preferably
republican”.
The demand by the council, which includes regimes like Saudi Arabia and Cuba among its 29 members, caused outrage last night.
With Countries like Saudi Arabia and Sudan pushing for this, one wonders at the insanity of these great thinkers.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
War Profiteering in Iraq
A BBC investigation estimates that around $23bn (£11.75bn) may have
been lost, stolen or just not properly accounted for in Iraq.
For the first time, the extent to which some private contractors have
profited from the conflict and rebuilding has been researched by the
BBC's Panorama using US and Iraqi government sources.
A US gagging order is preventing discussion of the allegations.
The order applies to 70 court cases against some of the top US companies.
Read More BBC NEWS | Middle East | BBC uncovers lost Iraq billions
Friday, June 06, 2008
Could the Zeppelin return to service?
Germany is producing zeppelins again. More than 70 years after the
infamous Hindenburg disaster, its latest airship was gently guided out
of the hangar doors last month to make its maiden test flight.
The
Zeppelin NT, built from endowment money left behind by German airship
pioneer Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin, will make further test flights
around Friedrichshafen over the coming months, before flying to London
- where a former contestant from The Apprentice, Rory Laing, plans to
offer tourist joyrides over the capital for £150 a throw.
Thursday, June 05, 2008
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
School gave me diploma illegally
Statistics, and 12th Grade Literature, in which I did not deserve. I
totally failed my Lit. exam scoring a 24, but on my report card it was
recorded as an 80, which was just enough for me to pass. Same with
Econ., I missed the exam completely, didn't even take it, yet it was
recorded as a 100 on my report card. With Stat., I didn't turn in most
of my assignments, but I wasn't given zeros, instead they were just
left blank so it wouldn't count against me. I know it's wierd for me to
complain about passing, but I was planning on being a 5th year senior
and now my plans are messed up. I don't know what type of lawsuit this
would be, or what kind of compensation I should be asking for (I would
like to get my diploma revoked if at all possible). Also, not sure if I
should be sueing the actual school, or just the individual teachers.
All I know is that it can't possibly be legal for a school to pass a
student without merit. Also, I kind of have a short time window as I'd
like to be reinstated before the next school year starts in August, and
I know these lawsuits take a long time to get resolved, and I don't
even know if it's possible to get one done that quickly, but I'd like
to try. Anyway, regardless of the circumstances, I would still like to
know if I have a case. Please help me out as I am desperately seeking
justice.
Monday, June 02, 2008
Sunday, June 01, 2008
Shocking news from Isael--incest out of control
Among Israel's ultra-orthodox Jews, the Haredim, social workers are
often called "child-snatchers" and the police "Cossacks," harking back
to the 19th century pogroms against Jews in Russia. These cloistered
communities, in which women are expected to raise and financially
support their large families while their husbands spend their days
stooped over the Torah, make up 10% of Israel's population and a third
of Jerusalem's, and consider themselves defenders of a core morality in
Jewish society. But that moral authority has come under scrutiny since
evidence began to emerge in March of incest, rape and child abuse in
four different ultra-orthodox enclaves around the country.
Click the link above to read more
Hillary deserves more respect
Truth has nothing to do with anything when it comes to what people believe during this dreadful period of US history. I believe that Republican evil doers have managed everything in this election year in order to gain a win for McCain.
The push to have Hillary throw in the towel when it is her perfect right to continue attempting to win the Democratic Nomination is amazing given that she is still winning Primaries.
I have nothing against Obama but I hate the protracted putting down of Hillary especially when the accusations are based on hearsay and idle gossip that isn't based on truth.
A Bank that won't screw you
The JAK Members Bank, or JAK Medlemsbank is a cooperative, member-owned bank based in Skovde, Sweden. JAK is an acronym for Jord Arbete Kapital in Swedish or Land Labour Capital.
A membership of approximately 35,000 (as of 2008) dictates the bank's
policy and direction. Board of Directors is voted annually by members,
who are allowed only to have one share of the bank. Similar to Islamic banking, the JAK Members Bank does not charge or pay interest on its loans (see Usury). All of the bank's activities occur outside of the capital market
as its loans are financed solely by member savings. As of 2008 members
saved 97 million Euros, of which 86 million are given as loans to
members. Administrative and developmental costs are paid for by
membership and loan fees (effective interest rate on loans is about 2,5% on average).
JAK banking is made possible by saving points system: members
accumulate saving points during saving periods, they use saving points
asking for a loan. The main idea is that one is allowed to take a loan
for himself in the same measure he allows other people to have loans,
saving into his account. For this reason - asking for a loan - earned
saving points must be equal to spent saving points, in order to keep
system sustainability. If a member is borrowing more saving points than
he has, he is obliged to continue accumulating so-called "aftersavings" during repayment period. "Aftersavings" are a fixed quota of money that one has to save after
his loan was given, in order to continue earning saving points. By this
way, at the end of his repayment period, earned saving points will be
equal to spent saving points, and at that time he will be able to have
back all his aftersavings.
Click the link above to learn more.
The big lie that isn't being discussed regarding the referendum in Quebec
Yet none of the institutions we depend on for justice seemed to give a damn
NORMAN WEBSTER,
The Gazette
Published: 6 hours agoThose
"spoiled" referendum ballots from 1995, off for burning or shredding or
kitty litter or whatever, represent a huge failure of Quebec society.
What we have here is inaction in one of the great political scandals in
Canadian history - arguably, the greatest of them all. If it had
succeeded, its consequences would have far outranked the Pacific
scandal or Beauharnois, Munsinger or sponsorship.
To
recapitulate, many thousands of perfectly valid No votes in the
sovereignty referendum were thrown out by Parti Québécois poll
officials. More such votes were accepted only because observers on the
scene raised a stink. Nobody knows how many No votes across the
province were, or almost were, illegally invalidated - but their total
could have been decisive in what everyone knew would be a
skin-of-the-teeth poll.
Simply put, this was fraud that could have cost us our country.
Now,
you might think this would qualify as a Big Deal. You might think it
merited serious investigation, followed by ruthless prosecution,
followed smartly by a few large cheeses being strung up by their
thumbs, preferably in public and in prime time. The message might have
gotten through that Quebecers will not accept this sort of criminality.
Yet
none of the institutions we depend on for truth and justice seem to
give a damn. All have given it the big yawn. Banana republics are, by
comparison, models of diligence and integrity.
When the affair
hit the light soon after the referendum, thanks to sleuthing by The
Gazette's William Marsden, Quebec's election commissar could hardly
bring himself to take notice. His successors, true to form, have
laboured on the file only to dispose of it. The police and crown took a
couple of low-level schmucks to court, said tsk-tsk when the case
collapsed and dropped all charges against 29 others.
Our learned
judges, meanwhile, have mostly contented themselves with gratuitous
advice to stop wasting their precious time. And our political parties,
those tireless defenders of the public weal? None of them has given a
peep about this ingenious, outrageous scheme to thwart the will of the
people and deliver us to political chaos and financial disaster.
During
the referendum campaign Daniel Johnson, leader of the No forces, made
the very sensible observation that you don't break up a country on a
recount. Ah, but could one have saved the country on a recount once the
separatist "victory" had been trumpeted across the seas and things
begun to unravel?
Could we have got the Patriotes back in the
tube? These are big hairy questions we almost had to answer, thanks to
this brazen attempt to rig the vote.
So where did it come from?
Are we seriously to believe that a few PQ bottom feeders thought up
this ingenious plot to declare No ballots "spoiled"? Tell me another.
We'll never know, though, once the ballots have been destroyed
physically and expunged from the collective memory.
Let's dream
for a moment. What might Quebecers have learned if a judge had handled
this case with the ferocity of "Maximum John" Sirica, the jurist who
broke open the Watergate scandal in Washington? What if we'd had the
equivalent of Senator Sam Ervin and his committee calling out the John
Deans and other slimy Nixon operatives to testify live on national
television?
How high up did all this go? What did (insert famous name) know and
when did he know it? How widespread was the planning for this criminal
caper? How flagrant were the "spoiled ballot" calls (pretty damned
flagrant, according to those who have seen examples)? Should we insist
on United Nations observers if we ever have to go through this again?
A
disagreeable element in the affair has been the performance of the
province's francophone media. Usually, they do a commendable job of
political coverage - always excluding the hotline ranters and the
tabloids that cynically punched up the "reasonable-accommodation"
crisis. Usually, one applauds. But it's hard to be enthusiastic about
coverage of this sorry affair.
Almost throughout the piece, our
colleagues have exhibited deep incuriosity. Their liveliest
contributions have been to berate The Gazette for not letting this one
go; for breaking the story in the first place, then not having the
decency to let it die a quiet death.
Get
over it, almost everyone keeps telling The Gazette, as the ballots edge
their way toward the memory hole. Keeping the story going without them
- without the physical proof - will not be easy. Loud will be the sighs
of relief in certain quarters when the ballots meet the shredder.
Meantime,
I'll be filing all this in a folder whose title sums up a memorable
mess: VOTE THEFT. Just an incredible story, and one that has not done
us proud.
Norman Webster is a former editor of The Gazette.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Insanity
READ A BOOK, GET CHARGED WITH RACIAL HARASSMENT
By Selwyn Duke
May 13, 2008
NewsWithViews.com
The May 9 edition of the New York Post carries a short article by an Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis student named Keith John Sampson. He tells a story of being charged with "racial harassment" simply because he was "caught" reading an anti-Ku Klux Klan book. I'm not kidding. Sampson tells his story:
The book was Todd Tucker's 'Notre Dame vs. the Klan: How the Fighting Irish Defeated the Ku Klux Klan'; I was reading it on break from my campus job as a janitor. The same book is in the university library . . . .
But that didn't stop the Affirmative Action Office of Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis from branding me as a detestable Klansman.
They didn't want to hear the truth. The office ruled that my 'repeatedly reading the book . . . constitutes racial harassment in that you demonstrated disdain and insensitivity to your co-workers.'
The affirmative-action officer – who draws a salary of $106, 000 a year to perform her crucial role and is obviously a woman of inestimable intellect – neither examined the book nor spoke with Sampson. He wasn't guilty before proven innocent. He was just guilty.
To make a long story short, the charges were only dropped months later after the institution of lower learning came under pressure from the media, the ACLU (hey, even a blind squirrel . . .) and a more noble entity called the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.
Since Sampson works as a janitor to, I would assume, help finance his education, he obviously wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Perhaps he was assumed to be one of those bigoted working class people of whom Barack Obama spoke. Anyway, it's good to see he is getting something for the many thousands of dollars he is paying to attend his illustrious Indiana university.
As outrageous as the story is, what is more troubling than the facts Sampson provided is what he omitted. He failed to identify the cultural forces responsible for his persecution or even hint at the wider problem. Perhaps the Post insisted he stick to only uncontroversial facts or maybe the fault lies with his own political correctness. It's probably both, as Sampson seems like a somewhat liberal man who is painfully naive about the power of the thought police (despite being victimized them).
For starters, Sampson fails to point out that the affirmative-action officer is a black woman named Lillian Charleston. Oh, that's not relevant? Sorry, but this is all about race. Mr. Sampson would never have been charged with racial harassment for reading a history book relating to the Klan were he not white; in fact, it's hard to imagine such a charge being leveled against a black person for any reason, given the double standards in the academy's politically-correct environment.
Advertisement
In case you're considering a career in the vital and growing field of affirmative action and wonder what credentials one must possess to become one of its storm troopers, here is Charleston's bio:
Lillian Charleston is nationally recognized for her expertise and knowledge of Affirmative Action and related issues. In addition to serving as the Affirmative Action Officer for IUPUI for the past 16 years, she previously worked as a desegregation specialist for the Indianapolis Public Schools. She has been an officer and board member of the American Association for Affirmative Action and the Indiana Industry Liaison Group. She also supports her community through active board service with the Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission, the Indianapolis Urban League, the Indianapolis Chapter of Big Sisters, and the Association for Loan Free Education. She earned her undergraduate and graduate degrees from Indiana University in Urban Studies, Counseling and College Student Personnel.
In other words, she specializes in grievance, social engineering, victimology and in what Rush Limbaugh has labeled get-even-with-'em-ism. To gain a little more insight into the mindset of this woman, read the letter she sent to Sampson about the charge:
Upon review of this matter, we conclude that your conduct constitutes racial harassment in that you demonstrated disdain and insensitivity to your co-workers who repeatedly requested that you refrain from reading the book which has such an inflammatory and offensive topic in their presence. You contend that you weren't aware of the offensive nature of the topic and were reading the book about the KKK to better understand discrimination. However you used extremely poor judgment by insisting on openly reading the book related to a historically and racially abhorrent subject in the presence of your Black co-workers. Furthermore, employing the legal "reasonable person standard," a majority of adults are aware of and understand how repugnant the KKK is to African Americans, their reactions to the Klan, and the reasonableness of the request that you not read the book in their presence.
During your meeting with Marguerite Watkins, Assistant Affirmative Action Officer [sic] you were instructed to stop reading the book in the immediate presence of your co-workers and when reading the book to sit apart from the immediate proximity of these co-workers. Please be advised, any future substantiated conduct of a similar nature could result in serious disciplinary action.
The letter reveals something else that should be obvious, which is that the individual filing the complaint against Sampson was also black. And this is another example of the relativistic standard applied in these matters. In other words, in judging the case, the affirmative-action office didn't analyze the action under the light of objective truth, but based on the feelings of a politically-favored individual, in this case an irrational one.
It much reminds me of a notorious sexual harassment standard about which I once read. To wit: If a woman feels as if she has been harassed, it is sexual harassment. It also brings to mind a quotation by John Stuart Mill:
“I can hardly imagine any laws so bad, to which I would not rather be subject than to the caprice of a man.”
One law (or policy) I can imagine that is so bad is one which subjects us to the caprice of other citizens. And this is increasingly America’s practice, as we’re now placing members of politically-incorrect groups at the mercy of the caprice of members of politically-favored ones. This does violence to the principle of human rights, as they are supposed to relate to God’s unchanging Truth, not man’s mercurial tastes. But in Sampson’s case, that his black co-worker felt aggrieved was justification enough to send out a lynching party.
Of course, we’re also subject to the caprice of affirmative-action storm troopers, as their feelings are used to determine whose feelings will be the yardstick of racial justice. And it's hard to imagine a scenario under which their feelings would ever tell them that a white person's feelings should be thus exalted. This brings me to my next point.
Keith Sampson, being Catholic and partially of Irish descent, was attracted to the book in question because it tells a story of people of his heritage contending with the Klan. Now, since we’ve been enjoined to pay homage to racial and ethnic pride, since it’s cast as a new virtue, where was the respect for Sampson’s feelings of it?
Of course, fairness and leftist ideologues don’t have the same address. In creating abominations such as affirmative-action officers, diversity counselors and sensitivity trainers, we have empowered people of low character, often vile, ignorant, unintelligent individuals (who else enters such a field?) with degrees in nothing. Some are the epitome of the mediocre modern inquisitor, a person who holds the fate of far better men in his soiled hands as he ruins lives with the stroke of a pen and justifies his wanting existence.
As for the last matter, what do you think would happen if the Lillian Charlestons of the world didn’t bring home a few scalps every month? Well, like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and other racial hustlers, they would lose their raison d’d’etre. Thus, they just have to find racism somewhere; they must extract the necessary pounds of flesh. And it is usually white flesh.
This brings me to my last point. For many years now we have heard about data used to justify charges of racial profiling. It will be determined that an inordinate percentage of blacks are pulled over by police in a given area, and that alone is viewed as sufficient cause to change law-enforcement procedures. Even more to the point, many claim that since blacks constitute a percentage of the prison population greatly exceeding that of the general one, it's evidence of systemic "racism."
So here is a study I'd like to see conducted. Let's ascertain the racial composition of those who have charges of racial harassment brought against them – and of those punished for same – on college campuses. Call me crazy, but I have a sneaking suspicion that virtually all those targeted are white.
Oh, yeah, I overlooked something. Only white people can be racist.
Let's just forget the whole thing.
© 2008 Selwyn Duke - All Rights Reserve
E-mail This Page
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Selwyn Duke lives in Westchester County, New York. He's a tennis professional, internet entrepreneur and writer whose works have appeared on various sites on the Internet, including Intellectual Conservative, nenewamerica.us (Alan Keyes) and Mensnet. Selwyn has traveled extensively in his life, visiting exotic locales such as India, Morocco and Algeria and quite a number of other countries while playing the international tennis circuit.
E-Mail: SelwynDuke@optonline.net
Website: selwynduke.com