Yet none of the institutions we depend on for justice seemed to give a damn
NORMAN WEBSTER,
The Gazette
Published: 6 hours agoThose
"spoiled" referendum ballots from 1995, off for burning or shredding or
kitty litter or whatever, represent a huge failure of Quebec society.
What we have here is inaction in one of the great political scandals in
Canadian history - arguably, the greatest of them all. If it had
succeeded, its consequences would have far outranked the Pacific
scandal or Beauharnois, Munsinger or sponsorship.
To
recapitulate, many thousands of perfectly valid No votes in the
sovereignty referendum were thrown out by Parti Québécois poll
officials. More such votes were accepted only because observers on the
scene raised a stink. Nobody knows how many No votes across the
province were, or almost were, illegally invalidated - but their total
could have been decisive in what everyone knew would be a
skin-of-the-teeth poll.
Simply put, this was fraud that could have cost us our country.
Now,
you might think this would qualify as a Big Deal. You might think it
merited serious investigation, followed by ruthless prosecution,
followed smartly by a few large cheeses being strung up by their
thumbs, preferably in public and in prime time. The message might have
gotten through that Quebecers will not accept this sort of criminality.
Yet
none of the institutions we depend on for truth and justice seem to
give a damn. All have given it the big yawn. Banana republics are, by
comparison, models of diligence and integrity.
When the affair
hit the light soon after the referendum, thanks to sleuthing by The
Gazette's William Marsden, Quebec's election commissar could hardly
bring himself to take notice. His successors, true to form, have
laboured on the file only to dispose of it. The police and crown took a
couple of low-level schmucks to court, said tsk-tsk when the case
collapsed and dropped all charges against 29 others.
Our learned
judges, meanwhile, have mostly contented themselves with gratuitous
advice to stop wasting their precious time. And our political parties,
those tireless defenders of the public weal? None of them has given a
peep about this ingenious, outrageous scheme to thwart the will of the
people and deliver us to political chaos and financial disaster.
During
the referendum campaign Daniel Johnson, leader of the No forces, made
the very sensible observation that you don't break up a country on a
recount. Ah, but could one have saved the country on a recount once the
separatist "victory" had been trumpeted across the seas and things
begun to unravel?
Could we have got the Patriotes back in the
tube? These are big hairy questions we almost had to answer, thanks to
this brazen attempt to rig the vote.
So where did it come from?
Are we seriously to believe that a few PQ bottom feeders thought up
this ingenious plot to declare No ballots "spoiled"? Tell me another.
We'll never know, though, once the ballots have been destroyed
physically and expunged from the collective memory.
Let's dream
for a moment. What might Quebecers have learned if a judge had handled
this case with the ferocity of "Maximum John" Sirica, the jurist who
broke open the Watergate scandal in Washington? What if we'd had the
equivalent of Senator Sam Ervin and his committee calling out the John
Deans and other slimy Nixon operatives to testify live on national
television?
How high up did all this go? What did (insert famous name) know and
when did he know it? How widespread was the planning for this criminal
caper? How flagrant were the "spoiled ballot" calls (pretty damned
flagrant, according to those who have seen examples)? Should we insist
on United Nations observers if we ever have to go through this again?
A
disagreeable element in the affair has been the performance of the
province's francophone media. Usually, they do a commendable job of
political coverage - always excluding the hotline ranters and the
tabloids that cynically punched up the "reasonable-accommodation"
crisis. Usually, one applauds. But it's hard to be enthusiastic about
coverage of this sorry affair.
Almost throughout the piece, our
colleagues have exhibited deep incuriosity. Their liveliest
contributions have been to berate The Gazette for not letting this one
go; for breaking the story in the first place, then not having the
decency to let it die a quiet death.
Get
over it, almost everyone keeps telling The Gazette, as the ballots edge
their way toward the memory hole. Keeping the story going without them
- without the physical proof - will not be easy. Loud will be the sighs
of relief in certain quarters when the ballots meet the shredder.
Meantime,
I'll be filing all this in a folder whose title sums up a memorable
mess: VOTE THEFT. Just an incredible story, and one that has not done
us proud.
Norman Webster is a former editor of The Gazette.
No comments:
Post a Comment