Saturday, July 26, 2008

The Fix is In

Court gags Cayman Whistleblower - Wikileaks
Court gags Cayman Whistleblower
From Wikileaks
Jump to: navigation, search

Grand Cayman News
Wednesday February 20, 2008

In the latest round of a saga that could have come from the pen of best-selling writer John Grisham’s novel, Bank Julius Baer (BJB) has succeeded in temporarily shutting down one outlet of Wikileaks, an international online transparency group.

According to internet reports, the Swiss banking giant has tried to silence their former Cayman Islands Chief Operating Officer, Rudolf Elmer, by using a court injunction to shut down the Wikileaks website, which contains what are alleged to be highly damaging documents about the bank’s offshore activities.

The Temporary Restraining Order, issued by the California Northern District Court in San Francisco, is aimed at a Domain Name Registrar, rather than just the actual publishers of controversial material, who are based outside US legal jurisdiction.

At the centre of the dispute are several hundred documents, purportedly showing offshore tax evasion and money laundering by extremely wealthy and, in some cases, politically sensitive BJB clients from the US, Europe, China and Peru, reportedly released by a Swiss whistleblower.

While the former Cayman Islands employee is apparently being targeted as the source of the material, he is not only reported to be emphatically denying releasing any documents but, according to all current reports, has not been connected with the leaks.

The original release of documents dates back to at least 2002/3 when secret BJB files relating to Cayman Islands accounts were sent to US tax authorities.

A further release of documents in 2005 targeted German account holders, whose details and account balances from US$5 million to over US$100 million, initiated a probe by the country’s authorities into possible tax evasion.

As a result, bank customers, who are understood to regard themselves as victims of a conflict between the bank and a former employee, may be forced to pay millions in taxes and in some cases could lose their entire investments.

While Mr Elmer is currently the target of BJB investigations, the whistleblower has apparently only ever been identified as ‘Teddy Baer’ or the ‘tax fraud revealer’.

Despite claims that the documents were “stolen” from the bank’s Grand Cayman office, there is no indication in any of the current reports that BJB filed any formal complaint with the Royal Cayman Islands Police Service (RCIPS), even though the removal of the documents certainly broke Swiss law and probably, according to one source, broke Cayman Islands’ law.

However, published reports suggest that BJB has conducted their own thorough, and sometimes robust, internal investigation into the leaks, including the use of private detectives.

One phase of this was subjecting Cayman-based employees to a polygraph, or lie detector test.

Mr Elmer has apparently, and without response, complained to the Cayman Islands government about the conduct of this test, which was, unlike in the USA where clear regulations exist for the conduct of polygraph tests, allegedly conducted without any statutory controls in place.

He also is reported to have claimed that his life was threatened and anonymous phone callers suggested the family should return to Switzerland “for their own good.”

Following the polygraph test, Mr Elmer was ‘laid off’ by BJB and returned to Zurich with his family. There, he claims to have been subjected to unrelenting pressure, including what he states was a half-million Swiss francs bribe, to stop doing something that he denies ever doing in the first place. In December 2007, he even took an unsuccessful anti-stalking case before the Swiss courts in an attempt to prevent BJB’s investigators following him.

Even though the documents and reports have been in the public domain for some time, BJB sought the California injunctions, stating the disclosures “constitute violation of trade secrets, conversion and stolen documents by former employee in violation of a written confidentiality agreement and copyright infringement, among other wrongful and tortuous conduct.”

Ironically, the move has not prevented access to the documents, and Cayman Net News had no problem reading the documents, along with Wikileaks’ comments on them, online.

Amongst the allegations Wikileaks makes against BJB are that the documents show evidence of deliberate tax evasion and, in one case, an account was allegedly used to handle bribery funds.

The latest high profile scandal comes at a time when the Cayman Islands, despite extensive work to ensure the offshore banking industry is properly regulated, is coming under renewed pressure from US legislators, who are claiming the islands represent an unacceptable haven for tax evaders. The revelation that bribe money may be flowing through accounts based in Grand Cayman will, although no official comment has so far been forthcoming, also be causing concern as the draft anti-corruption laws as still a long way from reaching the statute books. These laws, which are already in place in other offshore jurisdictions, would allow for the seizure of funds obtained by, or used for, bribery.

While this saga plays out in California, the RCIPS are currently investigating the death of another Swiss banker working in Grand Cayman. Frederic Bise was found dead in the back of his burning Mitsubishi Outlander on Friday, 8 February.

First appeared in the: Grand Cayman News

More shameful behavior for US Media

Framing Obama: what the Spectator and the New York Sun won't tell you - Wikileaks
How journalists desperate for dirt on Obama fell for forged documents without so much as an eye blink.
An image of Senator Obama with Raila Odinga in Kenya, 2006, together with a typical US conservative caption from 2008. This caption was taken from an article entitled Obama's Muslim Connection by Jon Christian Ryter. The same image is referenced by The Spectator's Melanie Phillips opposite. Mr. Odinga is, infact, a moderate Christian.
An image of Senator Obama with Raila Odinga in Kenya, 2006, together with a typical US conservative caption from 2008. This caption was taken from an article entitled Obama's Muslim Connection by Jon Christian Ryter. The same image is referenced by The Spectator's Melanie Phillips opposite. Mr. Odinga is, infact, a moderate Christian.

If Mr. Obama did not know about Mr. Odinga's electoral deal with the Kenyan Islamists when he offered his support, then he should have known. If he did know, then he is guilty of lending the prestige of his office to America's enemies in the global war on terror. We need to know exactly what Mr. Obama knew about Mr. Odinga, and precisely when he knew it.

— Daniel Johnson, The New York Sun

...the real significance of the picture is surely that it renews concern about Obama’s involvement in Kenyan politics — in particular, his apparent support for the Kenyan opposition leader Raila Odinga, who signed a memorandum of understanding with Kenyan Muslims to turn Kenya into an Islamic state governed by sharia law.

— Melanie Phillips, The Spectator

JOEL WHITNEY (Guernica Magazine) with JULIAN ASSANGE (Wikileaks)
Wednesday July 15, 2008

The transparency website Wikileaks has released a document further debunking claims that a Kenyan politician close to Senator Barack Obama sought votes by virtually pledging to turn the Christian country into a militant Muslim stronghold. Since the start of the year, the claims, contextualized to insinuate that Sentator Obama supports Sharia law, have been spread by both traditional and online media. As of July 2008, Google lists over 250,000 webpages connecting the two politicians.

Dated August 29, 2007, the new document is a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Kenya's now Prime Minister Raila Odinga and the National Muslim Leaders' Forum; in the MOU, Odinga pledges to look into the case of 100 Kenyans who were illegally renditioned to places like Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Somalia, and Ethiopia in January and February 2007. Wikileaks also released a followup letter and the names of witnesses to the signing of the document.

Last fall, a forged version was circulated in the lead-up to the presidential election in Kenya alleging a number of preposterous claims about Odinga. Rather than pledging, for instance, to look into the case of Abdulmalik Mohamed, a Kenyan held at Guantanamo, and others like him, the forged MOU alleged that Odinga had virtually agreed to turn Kenya into a new Saudi Arabia: allowing for Sharia Law, banning alcohol, mandating Muslim dress codes and so on. The document is significant for a number of reasons, in the United States because it re-contextualizes Senator Obama’s relationship with his ancestral homeland (on his father's side) and with Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga. For Kenyans, it is significant in that it corrects a lie about the prime minister that put him at odds with his voters.

Wikileaks published the forged document, which was spreading through email, listing it as a likely fake on November 14, 2007. It was not hard to debunk it.

"Most of the pledges [in the fake] couldn't be met by any presidential candidate,” Wikileaks wrote, “as they are inherently unconstitutional and would mightily annoy the non-Muslim majority in Kenya... The idea behind the smear is to turn a fairly large and committed evangelical Christian block against poor Raila, who is often accused of ambivalent religious allegiance."

Wikileaks’s analysis aside, it doesn't take very advanced math, wikipedia or googling skills to recognize that risking up to 80% of the vote (Kenya's Christian majority) to cater to a minority of 10% (its Muslims) doesn't add up and both Ralia Odinga and NAMELEF publicly declared the document a forgery. But writers like the New York Sun's Daniel Johnson fell hard for the fake. Senator Obama had just been to Kenya a year before and is a member of the same tribe (the 3 million strong Luo) as Raila Odinga; smelling an easy take down, Johnson swung. Here’s Johnson, two full months after Wikileaks first outed the document as probably a fake:

“In August 2006, Mr. Obama visited Kenya and spoke in support of Mr. Odinga's candidacy at rallies in Nairobi. The Web site Atlas Shrugs has even posted a photograph of the two men side by side. More recently, Mr. Odinga says that Mr. Obama interrupted his campaigning in New Hampshire to have a telephone conversation with his African cousin about the constitutional crisis in Kenya.”

Titled "The Kenya Connection," Johnson's piece ends with no shortage of conspiratorial drama and bravado:

“If Mr. Obama did not know about Mr. Odinga's electoral deal with the Kenyan Islamists when he offered his support, then he should have known. If he did know, then he is guilty of lending the prestige of his office to America's enemies in the global war on terror. We need to know exactly what Mr. Obama knew about Mr. Odinga, and precisely when he knew it.”

The same question must now be asked of journalists like Mr. Johnson. Wikileaks calls the fake MOU part of a "plot to frame Odinga and Obama" and notes that their calling the document a fake "did not stop Kenyan and US proponents of the document deliberately avoiding the WikiLeaks analysis by linking directly to the memorandum, as opposed to its description page [where it was plainly described as fake]."

The New York Sun, The Spectator and all those who followed have questions to answer about the quality and integrity of their journalism.

Exposing Swiss bank destruction of records of Holocaust victims.

Christoph Meili - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Christoph Meili (born April 21, 1968[1]) is a Swiss whistleblower.

In early 1997, Meili worked as a night guard at the Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS, precursor of UBS AG) in Zurich, Switzerland. He discovered that officials at UBS were destroying documents about orphaned assets, i.e., credit balances of deceased Jewish clients whose heirs' whereabouts were unknown. Destruction of such documents was a violation of Swiss laws.[2]

On January 8, 1997,[3] he took some bank files home. After a telephone conversation, he handed them over to a local Jewish organization, which brought the documents to the police, and eventually to the press, which published the document destruction on January 14, 1997.[4]

The authorities of Zürich opened a judicial investigation against Meili[5] for suspected violation of the Swiss laws on banking secrecy,[6] which is an offense to be prosecuted ex officio in Switzerland.[7] After charges were filed against him, Ed Fagan approached him and convinced him to move to the United States, where he was granted political asylum.[8][9] According to news reports, Christoph Meili and his family are the only Swiss nationals in history ever to have been granted political asylum in the United States.[10] On January 13, 1998, Fagan filed suit on behalf of Meili against UBS, demanding a sum of 2.56 billion U.S. dollars. The settlement between the Swiss banks and the plaintiffs on the order of US $1.25 billion on August 13, 1998 also covered Meili's law suit and thus ended it.[11]

Later in 1998 the investigations of the justice of Zürich against Meili for allegedly breaking the laws on bank secrecy were cancelled,[5] but Meili did not return to his homeland until 2003. His marriage ended as he was divorced at the end of February 2002.[12] In September 2003 he visited his family in Switzerland. In the Swiss newspaper Die Weltwoche, Meili criticized Fagan for having instrumentalized him and for having let him down. He claimed to have never received the US $1 million that he should have gotten[12] according to their agreements after the settlement with the Swiss banks in 1998.[13] According to a report by the Swiss newspaper Facts of March 17, 2005, he had, however, received US $750,000. (The newspaper did not state when this should have occurred.)[14] In April 2004, Fagan again launched a campaign against UBS and apparently again was supported by Meili in his endeavour.[15][16]

Meili studied communication sciences[17] right after his arrival in the United States. After completing his college degree[17] in May 2004[3] he found employment once more in the security sector. On May 14, 2005 he was naturalized as a US citizen.[17] In an interview with the Swiss newspaper Sonntagsblick on October 21, 2006, Meili re-iterated his criticism of Fagan and the Jewish organizations who had once championed him, stating again they had let him down. Meili, who still lives in Southern California, stated in that interview he was working for minimum wages.[18][19]

Justice in Iran

Iran to hang 30 convicts Sunday - CNN.com
The 30 had their cases tried by the highest judicial authorities and were found guilty of the charges brought against them, Iran's judiciary said in a statement.

The verdicts are final, and the sentences will be carried out Sunday, according to Fars.

According to Amnesty International, Iran executed 317 people last year, second only to China's 470. The U.S. executed 42 people in 2007, according to Amnesty International.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

4 techniques that drug companies won't tell you about

You won't believe how this South Carolina teacher marked this paper

This paper as you'll soon discover is very well written and I would say is factual but the brain washed teacher didn't see it that way. I would give the teacher a failing grade.

Brad Barrett's Iraq Paper

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Egyptian bad boys

Two-thirds of Egyptian men harass women? | Reuters

CAIRO (Reuters) - Nearly two-thirds of Egyptian men admit to having
sexually harassed women in the most populous Arab country, and a
majority say women themselves are to blame for their maltreatment, a
survey showed Thursday.




The forms of harassment reported by Egyptian men, whose country
attracts millions of foreign tourists each year, include touching or
ogling women, shouting sexually explicit remarks, and exposing their
genitals to women. "Sexual harassment has become an overwhelming and
very real problem experienced by all women in Egyptian society, often
on a daily basis," said the report by the Egyptian Center for Women's
Rights.




Egyptian women and female visitors frequently complain of persistent
sexual harassment on Egyptian streets, despite the socially
conservative nature of this traditional Muslim society.




The behavior could have repercussions on Egypt's tourism industry, a
major foreign income earner, with 98 percent of foreign women saying
they had experienced harassment in the country, the survey said.




The survey of more than 2,000 Egyptian men and women and 109 foreign
women said the vast majority of Egyptians believed that sexual
harassment in Egypt was on the rise, citing a worsening economic
situation and a lack of awareness or religious values.




It said 62 percent of Egyptian men reported perpetrating harassment,
while 83 percent of Egyptian women reported having been sexually
harassed. Nearly half of women said the abuse occurred daily.




Only 2.4 percent of Egyptian women reported it to the police, with
most saying they did not believe anyone would help. Some feared
reporting harassment would hurt their reputations.




"The vast majority of women did nothing when confronted with sexual
harassment," the survey said, adding that most Egyptian women believed
the victim should "remain silent." Continued...